Defence Minister Dragomir Zakov was quick to assert that NATO's Air Force command centre assessed the aircraft as a potential risk
In early June a small plane flew into Bulgarian airspace from the northwest and landed at what used to be a commercial airport near Vidin. Apparently, the aircraft refuelled. It is unclear whether the pilot or pilots got any on-the-ground assistance from anyone or just poured fuel into the plane's tank from canisters. Guards from a private security company that was supposed to protect the ruins of Vidin Airport, which was abandoned in the 1990s, noticed the activity and alerted the local police. But the aircraft was quicker. She took off before the police arrived.
The aircraft flew off eastward and landed at Targovishte, some 400 kilometres away. There, its passengers covered her with a piece of tarpaulin, installed a camera and left – before anyone could do a thing.
Since then the Bulgarian police and prosecutors have been unable to identify who the aircraft belonged to, why she flew through half of Bulgaria without getting intercepted and most importantly who and why flew her into this country one stormy night last June.
The Bulgarian Air Force commanders seem to have learned a lot since then.
In July two Soviet-manufactured MiG-29s were sent off from the Graf Ignatievo air base, in southern Bulgaria, to the area of Svishtov, at the Danube river, to intercept what was apparently a small aircraft that was flying at an altitude of 600 metres, or 1,800 feet, and did not have either a flight schedule or an activated transponder.
Defence Minister Dragomir Zakov was quick to assert that NATO's Air Force command centre assessed the aircraft as a potential risk. The MiGs followed the aircraft, a Cesna-150, and she landed peacefully at an airfield near the Pleven village of Bohot. The pilot of the aircraft was detained and released the following day. The MiG pilots, reportedly some of this country's youngest Air Force aces, were congratulated on the successful mission.
This is a joke, commented the Bohot airfield owner, Anton Georgiev. The Cesna was perfectly legitimate and did not break any rules as this type of aircraft was under no obligation to have an active transponder. The aircraft is the property of a local organisation that uses it for training purposes. According to him, the media frenzy that followed the incident was meant as a distraction from this country's failure to identify who and why flew the aircraft that landed and was abandoned at Targovishte in June.
-
COMMENTING RULES
Commenting on www.vagabond.bg
Vagabond Media Ltd requires you to submit a valid email to comment on www.vagabond.bg to secure that you are not a bot or a spammer. Learn more on how the company manages your personal information on our Privacy Policy. By filling the comment form you declare that you will not use www.vagabond.bg for the purpose of violating the laws of the Republic of Bulgaria. When commenting on www.vagabond.bg please observe some simple rules. You must avoid sexually explicit language and racist, vulgar, religiously intolerant or obscene comments aiming to insult Vagabond Media Ltd, other companies, countries, nationalities, confessions or authors of postings and/or other comments. Do not post spam. Write in English. Unsolicited commercial messages, obscene postings and personal attacks will be removed without notice. The comments will be moderated and may take some time to appear on www.vagabond.bg.
Add new comment